We design a read-only knowledge layer around your firm’s existing systems, connecting matter records, documents and correspondence so your team can retrieve relevant information across your firm’s history. Each implementation is tailored to your data structure, access requirements and workflows.
We are seeking small to mid-sized law firms for a focused pilot. Start with one document collection and one useful workflow, then assess whether broader retrieval across your firm would add value.
Find relevant information within selected, authorised sources, with document references to help your team check the result. Access rules are agreed and tested before users receive access. Retrieval can still miss information.
We prepare an agreed collection of documents for a separate search index, extracting readable text and useful details such as matter references, document types and dates. Uncertain matches are flagged for review. Your original files, folder structure and practice-management records remain unchanged.
Agree the document collection, users, deliverables and evaluation before the build. We confirm price and timing after reviewing scope and access requirements. Ongoing support is agreed separately.
Read-only by design. The pilot uses authorised read-only connections. It cannot rename, move, delete or write back to your original documents, database or practice management system. A separate search index holds the information needed for retrieval, with access and retention arrangements agreed before the pilot.
These examples help identify a useful retrieval task. We agree one workflow and document collection with your firm, then test it before considering a wider rollout. Results are for internal review.
Search selected precedents and previous work for a topic or clause, using available document details to narrow the results. Your team reviews the source and its suitability.
Find information within an agreed matter collection, with references back to the source. Any summary is for review and may omit relevant details.
Explore search over an approved email collection. Potential links to matters can be assessed using available references, without filing emails or updating matter records.
Search a selected collection for information relevant to a question, with source references for your team to review.
Find passages relating to a topic or term across approved documents, so your team can inspect the wording in context.
Search internal policies, procedures and reference material selected by your firm, with links to the relevant source.
Existing tools may already cover part of your workflow. Intergraite focuses on the document collections, context and retrieval requirements specific to your firm. The pilot tests whether that tailored approach adds value to your current setup.
LEAP Generator supports precedent search and documents across current and archived matters. Archie supports additional knowledge sources available across matters. We review the particular features your firm already uses before proposing a custom pilot.
An existing search or AI tool may meet your needs with configuration or document preparation. We identify a specific gap with your team and compare the pilot against your current process.
A tailored retrieval layer can use your filing conventions, document context and agreed access rules to search selected sources. We evaluate that approach with representative questions, without changing your source records.
Product references: LEAP Generator and Archie Knowledge Sources. Features and availability depend on the provider and subscription.
We assess how document text and available context, such as matter references, dates and versions, can help your team find relevant information. The approach is tailored to the agreed collection and tested during the pilot.
Connections are assessed against available APIs, permissions, subscriptions and provider approval. An approved export may be sufficient to begin. Storage, model processing, access, logging and retention arrangements are agreed before customer documents are processed. Australian-hosted and local deployment options are assessed against the pilot’s requirements.
Start with one collection and one workflow. Price and timing are confirmed after reviewing scope and access requirements. Each stage gives you a clear decision about what comes next.
We review one information problem, the available documents and who needs access. Together we agree the collection, access rules, deliverables and representative questions. Price and timing are confirmed after reviewing scope and access requirements.
Using approved document copies or authorised read-only access, we organise information within a separate search index. This helps connect related material without renaming, moving, deleting or updating records in your existing systems.
We evaluate relevant results, source references and access boundaries using agreed questions. We also test questions without supporting material and record missed or incorrect results.
Before pilot users receive access, we test the agreed access restrictions and explain the workflow and its limitations. Storage, model processing, logs and retention arrangements are documented in advance.
Review the results together and decide whether to refine, expand or stop. Ongoing support, index refreshes and further integrations are separately scoped. Exit arrangements cover copied information and the index.
No. The pilot uses approved exports or authorised read-only connections. It does not rename, move, delete or write back to original documents, the database or the practice-management system. A separate search index holds the information needed for retrieval.
We agree the authorised collection, users and access restrictions, then test those boundaries before pilot users receive access. Copied documents, indexes and outputs require protection too. The pilot supports internal review and does not provide legal advice.
We assess approved folders, document exports, selected libraries or correspondence. Live connections depend on available APIs, permissions, subscriptions and provider approval. An authorised folder or export may be enough to start.
Price and timing are confirmed after reviewing the workflow, document collection and access requirements. Each stage has an agreed scope and quote. Ongoing support and additional integrations are separately agreed.
Yes. Retrieval can miss relevant documents, and answers or citations can be incorrect. We test representative questions, source references, access boundaries and questions without supporting material. Your team checks important results against the original documents.
Intergraite is a Melbourne-based technology business building a connected knowledge layer for small and mid-sized law firms. We bring together selected matter documents, email and shared document libraries, helping lawyers find relevant knowledge from previous work alongside the matter at hand. Search is tailored to each firm’s filing practices and workflows, with source references and access controls designed around its confidentiality requirements.
We start with one document collection and one useful workflow, test it with your team, and expand as the results justify it.
Talk to usSource references help your team check retrieved information. We test relevant results and questions without supporting material, while recognising that retrieval can still miss information.
Your original records remain unchanged. Document preparation and matching take place in a separate search index, with review requirements agreed for the pilot.
Tell us what information your team struggles to find, where it lives and who needs access. We can discuss one useful retrieval workflow and whether a focused pilot is a suitable next step.